Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Pontuação geral
vs
Sony SEL1635Z

Sony SEL1635Z

Sony
74 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Landscape
Sigma
33
Sony
89
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Sony
80
Professional
Sigma
42
Sony
80
Budget
Sigma
56
Sony
78
Travel
Sigma
40
Sony
75
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Sony
74
Street
Sigma
46
Sony
64
Macro
Sigma
16
Sony
63
Portrait
Sigma
59
Sony
50

Especificações

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSSony SEL1635Z
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements13
Groups12
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear Motors
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm
Max Magnification0.19x

Prós e Contras

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Sony SEL1635Z

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Preços

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No current pricing available

Veredito

Vencedor: Sony SEL1635Z

Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Melhor em:

Portrait

Sony SEL1635Z Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Considere também