EarFun Wave Pro HP200

EarFun Wave Pro HP200

EarFun
75 Pontuação geral
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
81 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Budget
EarFun
79
Beyerdynamic
84
Commute
EarFun
64
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
EarFun
65
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
EarFun
78
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
EarFun
74
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
EarFun
59
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
EarFun
63
Beyerdynamic
68

Especificações

EarFun Wave Pro HP200Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.27 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionmemory foamreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeQuietSmart 2.0Adaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life80 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 10 hours playback15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count52
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
AppEarFun Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Prós e Contras

EarFun Wave Pro HP200

  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong anc (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong comfort (88th percentile)88th %ile

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 81 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Melhor em:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute