JBL Tune 720BT

JBL Tune 720BT

JBL
39 Totaalscore
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Totaalscore

Scores

Budget
JBL
38
Beyerdynamic
86
Commute
JBL
38
Beyerdynamic
84
Gaming
JBL
43
Beyerdynamic
82
Music
JBL
25
Beyerdynamic
82
Work
JBL
45
Beyerdynamic
80
Studio
JBL
15
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
JBL
44
Beyerdynamic
69

Specificaties

JBL Tune 720BTBeyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.23 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeadaptiveAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life40 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Chargingfast charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count62
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Voor- & Nadelen

JBL Tune 720BT

  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong battery (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average sound (24th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (34th percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Oordeel

Winnaar: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Beter in:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute