SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 종합 점수
vs
Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
85 종합 점수

점수

Budget
SanDisk
57
Kingston
87
Console
SanDisk
86
Kingston
81
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
86
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Kingston
83
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Kingston
74
Portable
SanDisk
23
Kingston
21

사양

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston KC3000
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
6,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
900,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
1,000,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllernCache 4.0Phison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
800
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

장단점

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile

결론

★ 승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 더 나은 점:

GamingConsolePortable

Kingston KC3000 더 나은 점:

BudgetLaptop