Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)
Crucial
34 종합 점수
vs
Patriot Viper Steel 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16
Patriot
67 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Crucial 8GB DDR3 SODIMM | Patriot Viper Steel | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 204 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 16 |
| Timings | — | 16-18-18-16 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP |
| Features | ||
| RGB | — | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Patriot Viper Steel 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
가격
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B)0.008달러당 점수
vs
Patriot Viper Steel 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL160.004달러당 점수
Crucial 8GB DDR3-1600 CL11 SODIMM (CT102464BF160B) 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Patriot Viper Steel
Scores 67 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 15 specs.
