Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
89 종합 점수
vs
G.Skill Flare X5 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
G.Skill
89 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group | G.Skill Flare X5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 30★ |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | 30-36-36-96 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | AMD EXPO, INTEL XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
G.Skill Flare X5 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- Strong capacity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
가격
결론
무승부
Both products are closely matched - Team Group wins 1 specs while G.Skill Flare X5 wins 3.
