Samsung QET QE50T 50"
Samsung
43 종합 점수
vs
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
MSI
96 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
사양
| Samsung QET QE50T 50" | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 50" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | LCD | OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 450 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 200x200 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 95W★ | — |
| Weight | 11.70 kg | 8.10 kg★ |
장단점
Samsung QET QE50T 50"
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average portability (25th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
결론
승자: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 28 specs.