Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517
Carl Zeiss
35 종합 점수
vs
Sigma 36B965
Sigma
35 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Macro
사양
| Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517 | Sigma 36B965 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 45 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 45 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Weight | 0.72 kg★ | 4.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
장단점
Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma 36B965
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
가격
Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517
Sigma 36B965
결론
무승부
Both products are closely matched - Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517 wins 1 specs while Sigma 36B965 wins 1.
