Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm
Canon
51 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Macro
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Street
Travel
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/28 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 305 mm★ |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong macro (69th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
결론
승자: Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm
Scores 51 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 14 specs.