Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 종합 점수
vs
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
Tamron
45 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Macro
사양
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron A17-200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.8-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Adaptall |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.08 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
장단점
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
결론
무승부
Both products are closely matched - Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS wins 1 specs while Tamron A17-200 28-200mm wins 2.