JBL JBLT110REDAME
JBL
39 종합 점수
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Wireless
Samsung
82 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
Calls
Travel
Commute
Music
사양
| JBL JBLT110REDAME | Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Wireless | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | s | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 9 mm | 12 mm★ |
| Drivers | 9★ | 2 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 50 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 102 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro (2024, ANC) Wireless Earbuds (SM-R630) - White |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 6 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 min for 1 hour playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 18 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Bixby |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Galaxy Buds2 Pro |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP57 |
장단점
JBL JBLT110REDAME
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (23rd percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Wireless
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
가격
JBL JBLT110REDAME
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Wireless
No current pricing available
결론
승자: Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Wireless
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 36 specs.
