Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

Samsung
44 종합 점수
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 종합 점수

점수

Budget
Samsung
49
TOZO
84
Gaming
Samsung
37
TOZO
80
Travel
Samsung
38
TOZO
74
Fitness
Samsung
49
TOZO
74
Commute
Samsung
39
TOZO
70
Music
Samsung
26
TOZO
68
Calls
Samsung
46
TOZO
66

사양

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm StereoTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factor—in-ear
Wearing Styleover-ear cupstrue wireless
Ear TipssMedium
Weight0.00 kg★0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size3.5 mm10 mm★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—20 kHz★
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB100 dB★
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—LDAC
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Type—hybrid
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless—✓★
Bluetooth—5.4★
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector3.5mm—
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—7 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
Charging—USB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—35 hrs★
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—4★
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice Assistant—Other
Touch Controls—✓★
App—TOZO App
Gaming Mode—✓★
Bone Conduction—✗
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX5

장단점

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong anc (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average sound (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

결론

★ 승자: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness