Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700
Intel
79 종합 점수
점수
Efficiency
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Server
Budget
사양
| Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | 000 | 285 |
| Codename | — | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 24★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 24★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 1700 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700
- Strong efficiency (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong platform (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile
가격
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM50.002달러당 점수
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 17000.001달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 24 specs.
