Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6326 16-core LGA4189
Intel
31 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Server
Productivity
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
사양
| Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | Intel Xeon Gold 6326 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 000 | 6326 |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 10★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 24★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon Gold 6326 16-core LGA4189
- Below average affordability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average single thread (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average efficiency (28th percentile)
가격
결론
승자: Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Scores 31 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 16 specs.
