Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Xeon E5320 4-core LGA 6
Intel
34 종합 점수
점수
Ai Llm
Budget
Server
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
사양
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Xeon E5320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon |
| Model | 000 | E5320 |
| Codename | — | Ice Lake-SP |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 10★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 4★ |
| P-cores | — | 26★ |
| Threads | — | 52★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 8★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 39★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 6 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64★ |
| TDP | — | 185★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon E5320 4-core LGA 6
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (79th percentile)
- Below average single thread (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average efficiency (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average multi thread (22nd percentile)
가격
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.002달러당 점수
vs
Intel Xeon E5320 4-core LGA 60.001달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Xeon E5320
Scores 34 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 23 specs.
