Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
Intel
38 종합 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
사양
| Intel Celeron G3900 | Thermal Grizzly 000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | — |
| Model | G3900 | 000 |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2★ | — |
| Threads | 2★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 0.5★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1151 | AM5 |
| TDP | 51★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 510 | — |
장단점
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
가격
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 11510.005달러당 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.002달러당 점수
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151 2.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Celeron G3900
Scores 38 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.