Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
Lenovo
25 総合スコア
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
ASRock
55 総合スコア
Lenovo Quadro NVSがおすすめ：
Someone running legacy multi-monitor setups or old workstation software that needs a cheap, low-power card with specific driver support, not for gaming or modern workloads.
ASRock Radeon RXがおすすめ：
Budget gamers who want solid 1080p performance and don't mind turning down settings at higher resolutions, this card delivers great value for around $250.
主な違い
- VRAM is the killer here: 8GB on the ASRock versus 2GB on the Lenovo. Modern games barely run on 2GB, and even basic video editing will choke.
- The ASRock scores 16,551 on PassMark G3D while the Lenovo manages 677. That's not a typo. The RX 7600 is roughly 24x faster in real-world graphics workloads.
- Power draw tells the story: 165W TDP on the ASRock versus 35W on the Lenovo. The Lenovo sips power because it's barely doing anything, not because it's efficient.
- The Lenovo has a 384-bit memory bus and 504 GB/s bandwidth, which sounds impressive until you realize it's feeding a GPU with 2GB of VRAM and no modern feature support.
- Customer sentiment backs this up: ASRock owners rate it 4.6/5 with praise for 1080p performance and thermals, while the Lenovo's 4.1/5 comes from people using it as a basic display adapter, not a performance card.
購入者の声
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
まだレビューがありません
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
82 100点中 信頼度: 中 18 件のレビュー
ASRock RX 7600 Challenger 8GBは、1080pでの堅実なパフォーマンス、優れた冷却、簡単なRGBソフトウェアで好評です。ユーザーは予算ビルドでのコストパフォーマンスを評価していますが、8GBのVRAMとレイトレーシングが高解像度では制限になると指摘する人もいます。一部はドライバの不安定性とASRockのサポート不足を挙げています。
長所
- 1080pでの堅実な性能
- 負荷時の良好な温度
- 簡単なRGBソフトウェア
- 予算ビルドに良い価値
- エネルギー効率が良い
短所
- 1440pで8GB VRAMが制限
- レイトレーシング性能が平凡
- アップデート後のドライバ不安定性
- ASRockのサポート不足
Performance 1080p 6
Value for money 5
Thermals 4
Build quality 3
Rgb software 3
Vram limitation 3
スコア
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
スペック
| Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 | Radeon RX 7600 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3 |
| Class | workstation | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 6 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 2 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | データなし | |
| Tensor Cores | — | 64★ |
| RT Cores | 54★ | 32 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055★ | 43.5 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273★ | 21.75 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 35★ | 165 |
| Recommended PSU | 450★ | 550 |
| Power Connectors | — | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Fan | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | — | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | — | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 3★ |
| HDMI | — | 1★ |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | — | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | — | 269★ |
| Slot Width | — | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Low Profile | ATX |
| Weight | 0.10 kg★ | 0.64 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | ✓★ |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | — | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
長所と短所
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong compute (66th percentile)
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average vram (16th percentile)16th %ile
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong affordability (75th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
価格
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation0.002ドルあたりのスコア
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black0.001ドルあたりのスコア
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation 2.0倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger
Scores 55 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.
