JVC HAFX38MA

JVC HAFX38MA

JVC
47 総合スコア
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 総合スコア

スコア

Gaming
JVC
32
TOZO
80
Budget
JVC
52
TOZO
80
Travel
JVC
29
TOZO
78
Fitness
JVC
43
TOZO
72
Calls
JVC
27
TOZO
70
Commute
JVC
26
TOZO
70
Music
JVC
27
TOZO
68

スペック

JVC HAFX38MATOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing StyleRounded toetrue wireless
Ear TipssMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX5

長所と短所

JVC HAFX38MA

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

結論

勝者: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 優れている点:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness