OM System PEN E-PL8 White
OM System
31 総合スコア
vs
Fujifilm X-T X-T4 Black 2020
Fujifilm
94 総合スコア
スコア
Photography
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Video
Streaming
Vlogging
Travel
スペック
| OM System PEN E-PL8 | Fujifilm X-T X-T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | X-Trans BSI CMOS 4 |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 26.100000381469727 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 160★ |
| Processor | TruePic VII | X-Processor 4 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | データなし | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 425 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 8.5 fps | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 20 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.36 kg★ | 0.53 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 600 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C (USB 3.2 / 3.1 Gen 1)★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
長所と短所
OM System PEN E-PL8 White
- Strong display (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong stabilization (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average sensor (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average video (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average af (31th percentile)
Fujifilm X-T X-T4 Black 2020
- Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sensor (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong evf (92th percentile)92th %ile
価格
OM System PEN E-PL8 White
No current pricing available
Fujifilm X-T X-T4 Black 2020
結論
勝者: Fujifilm X-T X-T4
Scores 94 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 20 of 31 specs.
