Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025

Gigabyte
88 Punteggio complessivo
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34" Black 2026

ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34" Black 2026

ASUS
86 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Gaming
Gigabyte
86
ASUS
89
Office
Gigabyte
85
ASUS
85
Professional
Gigabyte
83
ASUS
67
Entertainment
Gigabyte
76
ASUS
80
Creative
Gigabyte
80
ASUS
66
Portable
Gigabyte
14
ASUS
14

Specifiche

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27"ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34"
Display
Size27"34"
Resolution3840x21603440x1440
Panel TypeOLEDQD-OLED
Aspect Ratio16:921:9
Curved
Curvature1,800
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz175 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits250 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P399.3% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR400HDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power45W36W
Weight7.11 kg8.30 kg

Pro e Contro

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile

ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34" Black 2026

  • Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong feature (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong display (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (82th percentile)82th %ile

Prezzi

Both products are similarly priced.

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025

ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34" Black 2026

Verdetto

Vincitore: Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27"

Scores 88 overall, wins 2 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 29 specs.

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Migliore per:

CreativeProfessional

ASUS ROG Strix XG34WCDG 34" Migliore per:

GamingEntertainment

Da considerare anche