Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
Canon
65 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Macro
Budget
Street
Travel
Specifiche
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.94 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 700 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.26x★ |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Verdetto
Vincitore: Canon L RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM 135mm
Scores 65 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.