Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 1445 35-200mm
Nikon
32 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifiche
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Nikon NIKKOR 1445 35-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-4.5 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon F |
| Weight | — | 0.68 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual-focus |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR 1445 35-200mm
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Verdetto
Vincitore: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 9 specs.