MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
7 Punteggio complessivo
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5

AMD
80 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Server
MICRO CENTER
5
AMD
95
Productivity
MICRO CENTER
6
AMD
91
Ai Llm
MICRO CENTER
4
AMD
88
Budget
MICRO CENTER
10
AMD
52
Gaming
MICRO CENTER
7
AMD
52
Efficiency
MICRO CENTER
5
AMD
41

Specifiche

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWFAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Processor
Brand—AMD
Series—Ryzen Threadripper PRO
Model—7985WX
Codename—Storm Peak
Class—server
Process—5★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—64★
ThreadsDati non disponibili
128
Base ClockDati non disponibili
3,200
Boost ClockDati non disponibili
5,100
Cache
L2 Cache—64★
L3 CacheDati non disponibili
256
Performance
PassMark MultiDati non disponibili
131,843
PassMark SingleDati non disponibili
3,962
Memory
Memory Type—DDR5★
Max SpeedDati non disponibili
5,200
Channels—8★
Max MemoryDati non disponibili
2,048
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
Socket—sTR5
PCIe—5.0
PCIe LanesDati non disponibili
148
TDP—350★
Max Turbo Power—350★
Unlocked—✓★
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—None

Pro e Contro

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5

  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong platform (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Prezzi

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF is 1.039.954 JPY cheaper (6.0x less).

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 26 specs.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Migliore per:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Da considerare anche