Sony SEL1635Z

Sony SEL1635Z

Sony
74 Score global
vs
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Canon
77 Score global

Scores

Landscape
Sony
89
Canon
90
Professional
Sony
80
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Sony
74
Canon
82
Macro
Sony
63
Canon
82
Wildlife Sports
Sony
80
Canon
78
Budget
Sony
78
Canon
72
Travel
Sony
75
Canon
77
Street
Sony
64
Canon
67
Portrait
Sony
50
Canon
52

Spécifications

Sony SEL1635ZCanon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1316
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements24
CoatingFluorine CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear MotorsSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.19x1:3.85

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sony SEL1635Z

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Verdict

Gagnant: Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony SEL1635Z Meilleur pour:

BudgetWildlife Sports

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm Meilleur pour:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

A considérer aussi