Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

Rokinon
46 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
94 Score global

Scores

Professional
Rokinon
63
Nikon
94
Portrait
Rokinon
40
Nikon
88
Budget
Rokinon
41
Nikon
87
Street
Rokinon
60
Nikon
87
Macro
Rokinon
50
Nikon
84
Landscape
Rokinon
51
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Rokinon
57
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
64
Nikon
78
Travel
Rokinon
51
Nikon
71

Spécifications

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min75 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups911
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements33
CoatingUltra Multi-CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear STMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance690 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:7.71:5.26

Avantages & Inconvénients

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile

Verdict

Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports