TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm
TTArtisan
80 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
79 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spécifications
| TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 17 |
| Groups | 7 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | — | Nano Crystal Coat |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.68 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM and lead screw-type stepping motor★ | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 2.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 400 mm | 290 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm
- Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
Prix
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm0.003score par dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR0.001score par dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.0x meilleur
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Verdict
Gagnant: TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm
Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
