Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6
Canon
47 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto-zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 75 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.93 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.49 m | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.25x | 1:5.26★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average build (22nd percentile)
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.