Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma
52 Score global
vs
Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon
73 Score global

Scores

Landscape
Sigma
37
Canon
93
Travel
Sigma
29
Canon
84
Budget
Sigma
50
Canon
83
Professional
Sigma
46
Canon
82
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Canon
80
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Canon
77
Macro
Sigma
46
Canon
68
Portrait
Sigma
67
Canon
61
Street
Sigma
52
Canon
66

Spécifications

Sigma Sports 185956 500mmCanon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min500 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm70 mm
Elements1618
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperturef/32f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSigma SACanon EF
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.81 kg
Filter Thread46 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m210 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.21x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong optical (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Verdict

Gagnant: Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Scores 73 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm Meilleur pour:

Portrait

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports