Hasselblad XCD CPHB.00000718.01 55mm

Hasselblad XCD CPHB.00000718.01 55mm

Hasselblad
39 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Hasselblad
47
Nikon
95
Portrait
Hasselblad
23
Nikon
89
Street
Hasselblad
36
Nikon
86
Budget
Hasselblad
31
Nikon
86
Macro
Hasselblad
47
Nikon
85
Landscape
Hasselblad
44
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Hasselblad
35
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Hasselblad
41
Nikon
78
Travel
Hasselblad
40
Nikon
75

Especificaciones

Hasselblad XCD CPHB.00000718.01 55mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min55 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm28 mm
Elements913
Groups811
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements03
CoatingAsphericalMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountHasselblad XNikon Z
Formatmedium-formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typeinternal autofocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:6.41:5.26

Pros y Contras

Hasselblad XCD CPHB.00000718.01 55mm

  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (67th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredicto

Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports