Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony
74 Puntuación general
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh
72 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Travel
Sony
88
Ricoh
54
Macro
Sony
60
Ricoh
84
Landscape
Sony
75
Ricoh
48
Street
Sony
74
Ricoh
75
Video Cinema
Sony
64
Ricoh
73
Budget
Sony
71
Ricoh
58
Portrait
Sony
58
Ricoh
71
Wildlife Sports
Sony
67
Ricoh
54
Professional
Sony
66
Ricoh
66

Especificaciones

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS IIRicoh GR IIIx 40mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm40 mm
Elements97
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements1★0
Coating—Nano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EGR
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.26 kg
Filter Thread41 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAF híbrido
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm120 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros y Contras

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Veredicto

═ Empate

Both products are closely matched - Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II wins 5 specs while Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm wins 3.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II Mejor en:

BudgetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm Mejor en:

MacroPortraitVideo Cinema