Sony WH-RF400

Sony WH-RF400

Sony
22 Puntuación general
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Budget
Sony
28
Beyerdynamic
84
Commute
Sony
22
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
Sony
37
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
Sony
37
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
Sony
26
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
Sony
42
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
Sony
24
Beyerdynamic
68

Especificaciones

Sony WH-RF400Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.28 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min10 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length1.5 m
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life20 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time7 hrs1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingproprietaryUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Pros y Contras

Sony WH-RF400

  • Strong sound (75th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average battery (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (32nd percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Veredicto

Ganador: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Mejor en:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute