Team Group T-FORCE G50 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group T-FORCE G50 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
76 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group T-FORCE G50 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

82 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

Users generally appreciate this SSD for its affordability and solid performance, with several noting it outperforms its advertised speeds. It works well in NAS and desktop setups, though some mention minor drawbacks like the status LED and the need to manually attach heatsinks. Overall, it's seen as a great value for the price.

Pros
  • Affordable price
  • Fast performance
  • Works well in NAS
  • Easy installation
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Status LED annoying
  • Manual heatsink attachment
  • DRAM-less design
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Performance 4
👍 Ease of installation 2
🤔 Build quality 2
👎 Led indicator 1
👎 Heatsink attachment 1

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Team Group
65
Seagate
91
Gaming
Team Group
74
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
62
Seagate
84
Workstation
Team Group
71
Seagate
83
Budget
Team Group
69
Seagate
73
Portable
Team Group
21
Seagate
24

Specifications

Team Group T-FORCE G50Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
4,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
4,500
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerInnoGritE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,600
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓★✗

Pros & Cons

Team Group T-FORCE G50 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (15th percentile)15th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation