SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Overall Score
vs
Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Netac
49 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Netac
25
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Netac
52
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Netac
51
Budget
SanDisk
57
Netac
67
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Netac
42
Portable
SanDisk
23
Netac
13

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Netac NV3000
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,100
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,400
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
300
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
No data
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Netac NV3000 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2

  • Strong feature (79th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Netac NV3000 Better at:

Budget