Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8)

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8)

Kingston
30 Overall Score
vs
Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB 48GB DDR5-8000

Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB 48GB DDR5-8000

Team Group
78 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Kingston
25
Team Group
88
Workstation
Kingston
26
Team Group
84
Budget
Kingston
72
Team Group
71
Laptop
Kingston
24
Team Group
56
Server
Kingston
13
Team Group
36

Specifications

KingstonTeam Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB
Memory
TypeDDR3DDR5★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
8,192
49,152
Modules12★
Per Module
8,192
24,576
Pins240288
Rank2Rx8—
Performance
Speed
1,600
8,000
CAS Latency11★38
Voltage1.350000023841858★—
Class
ECC✗✓★
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 3.0
Features
RGB—✓★
Heat Spreader✗✓★

Pros & Cons

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8)

  • Strong affordability (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (31st percentile)

Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB 48GB DDR5-8000

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong latency (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong capacity (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average affordability (17th percentile)17th %ile

Pricing

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8) is ¥133,887 cheaper (21.1x less).

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8)0.005score per dollar
vs
Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB 48GB DDR5-80000.001score per dollar

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8) offers 5.0x better value for money

Kingston (KCP3L16ND8/8)

Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB 48GB DDR5-8000

Verdict

★ Winner: Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB

Scores 78 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 8 of 15 specs.

Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB Better at:

GamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Also Consider