Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm

Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm

Viltrox
60 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Sigma
100
Viltrox
54
Budget
Sigma
99
Viltrox
51
Macro
Sigma
96
Viltrox
74
Travel
Sigma
93
Viltrox
36
Video Cinema
Sigma
90
Viltrox
63
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
87
Viltrox
43
Portrait
Sigma
85
Viltrox
74
Professional
Sigma
84
Viltrox
66
Street
Sigma
80
Viltrox
55

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSViltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm20 mm
Elements2012
Groups149
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements5★4
Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coatingHD NANO Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.7f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades914★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.61 kg★1.20 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLAmanual focus only
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification1:2★—

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm

  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports