Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
82 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Tamron
97
Fujifilm
72
Macro
Tamron
92
Fujifilm
68
Street
Tamron
83
Fujifilm
91
Landscape
Tamron
87
Fujifilm
57
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
69
Professional
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
84
Portrait
Tamron
82
Fujifilm
82
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Fujifilm
79
Travel
Tamron
81
Fujifilm
66

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDFujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements209
Groups136
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements22
Coatingfluorine coatingNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2
Min Aperture4-7.1f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.13 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★stepping motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:3.81:7

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm Better at:

Street