Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

Sirui
38 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Tamron
97
Sirui
35
Macro
Tamron
95
Sirui
51
Landscape
Tamron
87
Sirui
31
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Sirui
32
Professional
Tamron
85
Sirui
43
Street
Tamron
83
Sirui
40
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Sirui
47
Portrait
Tamron
81
Sirui
45
Travel
Tamron
81
Sirui
21

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDSirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements2020
Groups1316
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
Coatingfluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4T16
Min Aperture4-7.1T1.9
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades916★
Build
MountSony EInterchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.59 kg★1.00 kg
Filter Thread67 mm92 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★—
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★650 mm
Max Magnification1:3.81:23.26

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-B 35mm

  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports