Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
88 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
80 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No customer feedback yet

Scores

Landscape
Canon
84
Sigma
99
Portrait
Canon
95
Sigma
52
Video Cinema
Canon
95
Sigma
68
Budget
Canon
94
Sigma
77
Professional
Canon
93
Sigma
67
Travel
Canon
77
Sigma
90
Macro
Canon
69
Sigma
86
Street
Canon
84
Sigma
59
Wildlife Sports
Canon
83
Sigma
75

Specifications

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USMSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min70 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements1720
Groups1314
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements25★
CoatingFluorine Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.822-45★
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.07 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeDual Nano USM★HLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance700 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.23x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS is ¥411,673 cheaper (3.7x less).

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 88 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroTravelLandscape

Also Consider