Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm
Tamron
83 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Fujifilm
74 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard-zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 23 |
| Groups | 13 | 16 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3 | 6★ |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-M | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.46 kg★ | 0.99 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | VXD Linear Motor | Triple Linear Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 1.00 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.6★ | 0.12x |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.