Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma
37 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
40
Tamron
97
Macro
Sigma
49
Tamron
95
Landscape
Sigma
37
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
31
Tamron
85
Professional
Sigma
37
Tamron
85
Street
Sigma
33
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
39
Tamron
82
Portrait
Sigma
32
Tamron
81
Travel
Sigma
32
Tamron
81

Specifications

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm300 mm
Elements1820
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—fluorine coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/4
Min ApertureT34-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades12★9
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.30 kg0.59 kg★
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance400 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:3.11:3.8

Pros & Cons

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports