Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Nikon
73 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

Sigma
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This classic Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8 lens is praised for its rugged build, sharp optics, and fast autofocus, making it a favorite among professionals for landscapes, portraits, and reportage. Users note it performs best on lower-megapixel FX cameras like the D700 and 35mm film bodies, while cautioning about potential autofocus squeak in some copies and heavy weight. Despite its age, it remains a versatile and reliable wide-angle zoom that delivers excellent color and contrast.

Pros
  • Rugged all-metal construction
  • Sharp optics with excellent contrast
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Versatile for landscapes, portraits, and reportage
  • Accepts 77mm filters
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • Potential autofocus squeak in some copies
  • Not ideal for high-megapixel FX cameras
  • Shadow from built-in flash at 17mm
  • Expensive
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 3

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

85 out of 100 high confidence 165 reviews

The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Art lens receives largely positive feedback for its sharp optics, solid build, and excellent value compared to OEM alternatives. Many users praise its image quality, especially in the center, and appreciate the included image stabilization. However, some reviewers report inconsistent autofocus, requiring micro-adjustments or the USB dock for calibration, and note that the lens is significantly heavy. A few copies exhibited soft corners or front/back focus issues.

Pros
  • Sharp optics
  • Solid build quality
  • Great value for money
  • Effective image stabilization (OS)
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • Inconsistent autofocus
  • Soft corners at some focal lengths
  • Needs micro-adjustment or USB dock for calibration
  • Front/back focus issues on some copies
👍 Image quality 45
🤔 Autofocus performance 38
👍 Build quality 30
👎 Weight 27
👍 Value for money 26
👍 Image stabilization 18

Scores

Macro
Nikon
65
Sigma
95
Budget
Nikon
71
Sigma
95
Professional
Nikon
60
Sigma
90
Portrait
Nikon
76
Sigma
90
Video Cinema
Nikon
64
Sigma
90
Landscape
Nikon
48
Sigma
86
Street
Nikon
60
Sigma
77
Travel
Nikon
45
Sigma
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
45
Sigma
73

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mmSigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm70 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements23★
Coating—Super Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.74 kg★1.02 kg
Filter Thread77 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor (SWM)HSM
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile

Pricing

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art is ¥290,199 cheaper (2.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider