Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon Series II 85mm f/1.4 85mm

Rokinon Series II 85mm f/1.4 85mm

Rokinon
65 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Rokinon
64
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Rokinon
49
Travel
Nikon
92
Rokinon
44
Landscape
Nikon
88
Rokinon
47
Professional
Nikon
83
Rokinon
66
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
69
Street
Nikon
81
Rokinon
60
Portrait
Nikon
78
Rokinon
76
Macro
Nikon
74
Rokinon
55

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRRokinon Series II 85mm f/1.4 85mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm85 mm
Elements199
Groups157
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements11
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/1.4
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm★1.00 m
Max Magnification0.28x1:9★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Rokinon Series II 85mm f/1.4 85mm

  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (69th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports