Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

Leica
32 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Leica
29
Tamron
97
Macro
Leica
23
Tamron
95
Landscape
Leica
27
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Leica
24
Tamron
85
Professional
Leica
35
Tamron
85
Street
Leica
35
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
Leica
34
Tamron
82
Portrait
Leica
36
Tamron
81
Travel
Leica
26
Tamron
81

Specifications

Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min21 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max21 mm300 mm
Elements620
Groups413
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements4★2
Coating—fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/3.44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountLeica MSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.33 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance700 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.00103472221:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Leica Super Elmar-M 11145 21mm

  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports