Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm

Laowa
40 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Laowa
39
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Laowa
24
Nikon
94
Travel
Laowa
26
Nikon
92
Landscape
Laowa
33
Nikon
88
Professional
Laowa
34
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Laowa
37
Nikon
82
Street
Laowa
37
Nikon
81
Portrait
Laowa
43
Nikon
78
Macro
Laowa
54
Nikon
74

Specifications

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min33 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max33 mm200 mm
Elements1419
Groups915
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements11
Coating—ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/11f/4
Min Aperturef/0.954-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.59 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlystepping motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:2★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO 33mm

  • Strong optical (67th percentile)
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports