Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
87 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Weather sealing
  • Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
  • Not a macro lens
  • Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
  • No zoom capability
  • Tapered design may look odd
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Portability 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Weather sealing 4

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
95
Fujifilm
64
Budget
Panasonic
90
Fujifilm
68
Travel
Panasonic
87
Fujifilm
74
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
57
Video Cinema
Panasonic
85
Fujifilm
64
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Fujifilm
59
Professional
Panasonic
81
Fujifilm
70
Street
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
73
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Fujifilm
61

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmFujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements179
Groups136
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements4★2
CoatingFluorine coatingNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusstepping motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:7★

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is ¥132,734 cheaper (3.4x less).

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider