Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm
54 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
99
Fujifilm
48
Budget
Panasonic
91
Fujifilm
56
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
51
Travel
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
48
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
61
Street
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
56
Professional
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
61
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Fujifilm
50
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Fujifilm
50

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmFujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm56 mm
Elements1713
Groups138
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements4★1
CoatingFluorine coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountL-MountFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification0.5x★0.14x

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports