KOMQI 2216

KOMQI 2216

KOMQI
47 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 36B965

Sigma 36B965

Sigma
35 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
KOMQI
61
Sigma
40
Portrait
KOMQI
54
Sigma
60
Street
KOMQI
44
Sigma
41
Travel
KOMQI
42
Sigma
15
Video Cinema
KOMQI
39
Sigma
36
Wildlife Sports
KOMQI
37
Sigma
27
Landscape
KOMQI
34
Sigma
14
Professional
KOMQI
33
Sigma
30
Macro
KOMQI
16
Sigma
16

Specifications

KOMQI 2216Sigma 36B965
Optics
Focal Length Min18 mm45 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm45 mm
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/3.5-6.3
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
Weight0.55 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization

Pros & Cons

KOMQI 2216

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Sigma 36B965

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Verdict

Winner: KOMQI 2216

Scores 47 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 10 specs.

KOMQI 2216 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma 36B965 Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider