OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm
OM System
47 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
Canon
77 Overall Score
Scores
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Budget
Street
Portrait
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm | Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 75 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 16 |
| Groups | 13 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| Coating | ZERO coating | Super Spectra Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 4.8-6.7 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Canon RF |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.42 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 900 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.56 | 1:3.85 |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Pricing
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II 300mm
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
Verdict
Winner: Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
Scores 77 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.
