Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
77 Overall Score
vs
Canon 3560B002

Canon 3560B002

Canon
83 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
78
Canon
95
Portrait
Nikon
73
Canon
83
Macro
Nikon
82
Canon
73
Video Cinema
Nikon
75
Canon
82
Street
Nikon
67
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
55
Canon
74
Landscape
Nikon
62
Canon
73
Professional
Nikon
69
Canon
72
Travel
Nikon
55
Canon
68

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRCanon 3560B002
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm85 mm
Elements1717
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements2★1
CoatingNano Crystal CoatSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.68 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:4★0.22x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)

Canon 3560B002

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is ¥105,552 cheaper (2.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Canon 3560B002

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon 3560B002

Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Better at:

Macro

Canon 3560B002 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider