Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
77 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Canon
72 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Travel
Budget
Landscape
Video Cinema
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 105 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 12 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/24 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.68 kg | 0.40 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 2.5 stops | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 290 mm | 201 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:4 | 1:2 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong macro (74th percentile)
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 77 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
